About your Search

20130421
20130421
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)
after boston. and he said technology was the key. and he's on the homeland security committee, mike rogers from alabama. i asked h saying that many civil libertarians have some problems with some of the things that are proposed and they want to do. put more cameras ever-place. some of the other security measures. and he said, and i'm paraphrasing here, well, civil libertarians have a problem with pretty much everything. i think that he is -- i think he was kind of joking, but not really. he came back to it and said, you know, i think the naysayers and civil libertarians are in the minority and mosamericans believe that they -- that we have to do more in the security realm. you know, there are others like senator rand paul and another -- kind of a growing minority, i will say a minority, but a growing population up on capitol hill who are concerned about where that line is with, you know, security and giving up freedom. >> yeah. and that's the question i think a lot of people have too. and you're talking about the fact that more americans today are saying, okay, okay, i'll give up so
we would get serious about securing the borders. about providing manpower and technology to finally stop the problem of illegal immigration. number two, we'd devote resources to improve and streamline legal immigration. so that we can welcome and celebrate those who follow the law and come here seeking the american dream. the president's focus on insisting on a path to citizenship for those here illegally is designed to scud the entire bill because he wants a political issue rather than to pass common sense immigration reform. >> lou: we have to leave it there. i wish we had more time. come back een. this seems like number of issues important to the nation. thank you for being with us here tonight. >> senator ted cruz. the obama administration has a knack, don't they? another failed green car company csting taxpayers millions more. millions more. how do they do it? all stations come over to mission a for a final go. this is for real this time. step seven point two one two. this irify and lock.s time. command is locked. five seconds. three, two, one. standing by for capture. the most
securing the borders. about providing manpower and technology to finally stop the problem of illegal immigration. number two, we'd devote esources to improve and streamline legal immigration. so that we can welcome and celebrate those who follow the law and come here seeking the american dream. the president's focus on insisting on a path to citizenship for those here illegally is designed to scud the entire bill because he wants a political issue rather than to pass common sense immigration reform. >> lou: we have to leave it there. i wish we had more time. come back seen. this seems like number of issues important to the nation. thank you for being with us here tonight. >> senator ted cruz. the obama administration has a knack, don't they? another failed green car company costing taxpayers millions more. how do they do it? thank you orville and wilbur... ...amelia... neil and buzz: for teaching us that you can't create the future... by clinging to the past. and with that: you're history. instead of looking behind... delta is looking beyond. 80 thousand of us investing billions... i
. three more minutes until "fox & friends." ♪ using telemedical and mobile technologies, verizon innovators are connecting trauma surgeons to patients in the field. helping them get the attention they need, before they even reach the hospital. because the world's biggest challenges deserve even bigger solutions. powerful answers. verizon. >> alisyn: we are rejoined by the founder of american islamic form for democracy. dr. zdudi jasser. you talk about how you wish that more law abiding, peaceful muslims would come out and condemn these things when it happened. you must have been heartened by the suspect's uncle who immediately came out and vociferously said he completely disavow what they stand for. he's disgusted by the actions and he wishes he could turn them in. if he knew where they were. is that what you are talking about? >> yeah. at the last step, absolutely, that is disheartening. they don't get radicalized overnight. they are talking about conspiracy theories and nonsense about being framed. this is easy when someone doesn't ask for the community to say he was kicked out
were on schedule. the first technology of its kind... mom and dad, i have great news. is now providing answers families need. siemens. answers. >> lou: north korea telling all foreigners to evacuate south korea. claiming the two countries are on the verge of nuclear war. officials at the u.s. embassy in seoul say staffers aren't going anywhere. earlier, the top navy commanderer in the pacific said the united states could shoot down a missile if north korea does launch one in the next few days. but only if it poses a threat to u.s. interests. >> if the missile was inthe defensof the homeland i would certainly recommend that action. if it was defense of our allies, i would recommend that action. >> my question is would you recommend that we intercept a missile if it is launched by north korea no matter where the intended target is? >> i would not recommend that. >> lou: joining us now, jep jack k evenane, retired, four-star, armygeneral, former vice chief of staff of the army. also fox news military analyst. jep, good to have you with us. >> good to be here, lou. >>ou: admiral locklear t
but in the modern american state with a local economy in the fast-moving technology we need a very strong executive. now, i don't think we need to settle that, whether we should have a powerful executive or not is not critical to my argument because even if the executive branch is not accumulating too much power it has amassed too much power for one person. that's the problem. because when one person exercises the summer must power in the modern u.s. presidency we shouldn't be surprised if the system breaks down. a single president represents the views of one political party. all of us want to have a voice but only have the public has a meaningful input. currently we have a democratic president who represents the views of the democratic voters. from 2001 to 2008 where the republican president who represent the views of republican voters so it's no wonder when you have one president from one party that the party out of power spends all of its time trying to regain the oval office and not enough that it's time trying to adjust -- so under the current system democrats and republicans fight tooth and n
the door for this, but this is why i answer the way i did that i see that with the technology goings way it is and with drone technology advancing and drones getting smaller and smaller, they are not going to the the giant, big predators flying over pakistan, but little small drones to be armed with things. this is not science fiction here in terms of this is actually happening. >> booktv on location on the campus of the university of southern california at the l.a. times festival of books talking with mark mazzetti, "new york times" national security correspondent and author of this book, "the way of the knife," and, jim, you're the next caller from idaho. hi, jim. >> caller: good afternoon, gentlemen. i have a question. the la proider of servicee of to the war department in afghanistan, and i asked how the afghans were going, and i quoted him in the remark right now saying that it's basically a total failure. he went into details about that aspect of what basic means. what do you think the result is basically in afghanistan? >> well, it's obviously a question on a lot of people's mind.
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)